Atkins Demands a Correction and an Apology
Colette Heimowitz, Nutritionist
As the Vice President of Nutrition and Education at Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. Colette Heimowitz has been a driving force behind the scenes at the Atkins Learning Center. She brings a wealth of talents and experience to the job. Colette’s clinical nutrition degree comes full circle in keeping current with respect to the scientific research related to the Atkins Diet and nutrition translating that information for the discussion boards as well as the Atkins web site... Read more
Déjà vu all over again. Have you ever noticed that if negative news comes out that has anything to do with “lower-carb” or “higher-protein” diets, the media automatically assumes it has everything to do with Atkins, when in many (and very often most) cases, they are dead wrong. Well, it’s happened again.
In its most recent issue, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) issued a false and misleading statement that, according to a recent Swedish study, an “Atkins-style” diet is to blame for increased risk of cardiovascular disease among a specific female population in Sweden. But, there could be nothing further from the truth. In fact, the study itself never mentioned the term “Atkins-style”, and the diet in the study did not in any way resemble the Atkins Diet.
The BMJ is a well-respected publication, which makes it even more disappointing when it chooses to publish a misleading editorial that tarnishes the name of Atkins. This is a true disservice to the Atkins community and the thousands of people who have successfully lost weight and improved their health while following Atkins.
The observational study that the BMJ reports on simply states that “fewer carbs” and “higher protein” intake was associated with higher incidence of heart disease. No correlation to types of carbs or actual amounts consumed. In fact, the diet tested included on average 51% carbohydrates, and 51% of carb consumption is NOT even close to what Atkins recommends, even in weight maintenance. Long-term adherence to low-carbohydrate diets requires careful food choices, which the Atkins Diet teaches in all educational materials and published books. Observing that woman consumed “fewer carbohydrates” and “higher protein” does not reflect an ATKINS way of eating.
In addition, the study’s researchers' did not have data on lipid profiles, an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, instead they looked for a diagnosis of incident cardiovascular disease, which can have many other variables including being overweight. Stroke is associated with high triglycerides and low HDL. The Atkins Diet has demonstrated time and time again in clinical trials that HDL goes up and triglycerides plummet, an indication these woman were obviously not doing any form of Atkins. To compare epidemiology study to epidemiology study, The Harvard Nurses ‘Health Study in the United States, found that diets lower in carbohydrates and higher in protein and fat were not associated with increased incidence of ischemic heart disease in women.
It appears that BMJ, to draw public attention to this story, misleadingly inserted the false suggestion that an “Atkins-style” diet was used in this study. They even omitted the conclusion of the Swedish researchers that diets similar to the Atkins Diet do not necessarily harm cardiovascular health. Even Professor David Haslam, current Chair of the National Obesity Forum adds, “The editorial to this Swedish research is below the standards one expects of the British Medical Journal and betrays the lack of awareness of scientific principles or the requirement of checking facts before publication. The Atkins Diet is a scientifically validated one, which is balanced and contains the foods deemed important by this paper. Furthermore, Atkins is a diet I recommend to my patients.”
As shown through countless studies and its support in the medical and scientific community, Atkins is a diet that is safe and that works, as many of you (and millions of successful dieters across the globe) have experienced firsthand. Don’t let the false and negative press detract you from achieving your goals with Atkins.
In fact, we at Atkins feel so strongly about this misleading editorial, that we have asked for an apology and corrective action from the BMJ. We are just not going to stand for it anymore and will defend the Atkins Diet to the end! Stayed tuned, as I will be more than happy to share this with you!
In its most recent issue, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) issued a false and misleading statement that, according to a recent Swedish study, an “Atkins-style” diet is to blame for increased risk of cardiovascular disease among a specific female population in Sweden. But, there could be nothing further from the truth. In fact, the study itself never mentioned the term “Atkins-style”, and the diet in the study did not in any way resemble the Atkins Diet.
The BMJ is a well-respected publication, which makes it even more disappointing when it chooses to publish a misleading editorial that tarnishes the name of Atkins. This is a true disservice to the Atkins community and the thousands of people who have successfully lost weight and improved their health while following Atkins.
The observational study that the BMJ reports on simply states that “fewer carbs” and “higher protein” intake was associated with higher incidence of heart disease. No correlation to types of carbs or actual amounts consumed. In fact, the diet tested included on average 51% carbohydrates, and 51% of carb consumption is NOT even close to what Atkins recommends, even in weight maintenance. Long-term adherence to low-carbohydrate diets requires careful food choices, which the Atkins Diet teaches in all educational materials and published books. Observing that woman consumed “fewer carbohydrates” and “higher protein” does not reflect an ATKINS way of eating.
In addition, the study’s researchers' did not have data on lipid profiles, an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, instead they looked for a diagnosis of incident cardiovascular disease, which can have many other variables including being overweight. Stroke is associated with high triglycerides and low HDL. The Atkins Diet has demonstrated time and time again in clinical trials that HDL goes up and triglycerides plummet, an indication these woman were obviously not doing any form of Atkins. To compare epidemiology study to epidemiology study, The Harvard Nurses ‘Health Study in the United States, found that diets lower in carbohydrates and higher in protein and fat were not associated with increased incidence of ischemic heart disease in women.
It appears that BMJ, to draw public attention to this story, misleadingly inserted the false suggestion that an “Atkins-style” diet was used in this study. They even omitted the conclusion of the Swedish researchers that diets similar to the Atkins Diet do not necessarily harm cardiovascular health. Even Professor David Haslam, current Chair of the National Obesity Forum adds, “The editorial to this Swedish research is below the standards one expects of the British Medical Journal and betrays the lack of awareness of scientific principles or the requirement of checking facts before publication. The Atkins Diet is a scientifically validated one, which is balanced and contains the foods deemed important by this paper. Furthermore, Atkins is a diet I recommend to my patients.”
As shown through countless studies and its support in the medical and scientific community, Atkins is a diet that is safe and that works, as many of you (and millions of successful dieters across the globe) have experienced firsthand. Don’t let the false and negative press detract you from achieving your goals with Atkins.
In fact, we at Atkins feel so strongly about this misleading editorial, that we have asked for an apology and corrective action from the BMJ. We are just not going to stand for it anymore and will defend the Atkins Diet to the end! Stayed tuned, as I will be more than happy to share this with you!
Comments (11)
Add a new comment:
Amelia Hodder
In 1972 my BP had risen I was overweight and unhappy. I bought the Atkins Diet Revolution book and in 6 weeks I lost 18 pounds , my BP dropped to normal for me around 104/70 and I felt great. But listening to other people warning about the dangers of Atkins I foolishly drifted away from it. I am so happy to see Dr. Atkins vindicated in several books by prominent doctors who are saying a low carb high fat diet is better than the High carb low fat diet that has increased obesity and diabetes in the last few years.
Jul 04, 2012 at 03:24 AM
Jim Bowron
Here is a web-site with detailed analysis of the study.
http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e4026?tab=responses
http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e4026?tab=responses
Jul 04, 2012 at 07:53 PM
Darlene Desveaux
I am living proof that Atkins is a healthy lifestyle. In the past 3 months my HDL has risen, LDL and trigylcerides have dropped dramatically. My doctor is estatic!
Jul 11, 2012 at 03:25 PM
Jacquelyn Miller
That is fantastic news Darlene! Although I didn't have any major healthy concerns before I began, I know I am now in the best shape of my life! Congrats on your progress!
:)
:)
Jul 11, 2012 at 03:43 PM
Debbie Keown
I have also experienced the comments "Oh your on the Atkins diet! Be careful, if you eat too much protien it could be dangerous!" I always have to explain it isn't about excessive protien but about good carbs, fats and protien. It's a very healthy way of eating. All my lab results have shown extremely positive numbers as well. Don't give in to the public pressure everyone. Keep on getting healthier.
Aug 01, 2012 at 08:19 PM
Sammi Daugh
I had to move away from the Atkins plan for several reasons - not one of them related to the actual plan. I had severe financial and medical issues (again not from the plan but from an existing condition). I just wasn't able to put the time and mental energy into the careful balance required. That and the high cost of eating healthy (ironic I know) are my only two issues with the plan. I initially lost about 80lbs when nothing else worked for me.
It is highly disappointing to see a respectable journal publish this. The article didn't seem to mention even the real quantification or adequate comparison studies, no sign of replication either. Sad and it is a poor job for the BJM.
On the good news side, while dietitians in Canada don't recommend Atkins per se, the view about it IS changing. While it is true apparently that weight loss by low carb or low fat equal out eventually, no one has published anything about the reasons why the low fat plans just don't kick start some people. My body simply refuses to work on high-carb plans. I cannot lose at all. Some can but no one seems to study why that is.
Dietitians here seem to be more open to lower carb plans and choices. I am happy about that. I also see that the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation has an interactive food/weight tracking plan called Healthy weight action plan. The nice thing in it is that they allow people to choose between types of meal plans they recommend and one of the options is reduced carb. It isn't atkins but it is a lot better than the previous perceptions.
I am now using that one, the HWAP, but I have my atkins book in the kitchen and my goal is to get my intake healthy first and foremost and then keep it there as I transition toward Atkins again.
It is highly disappointing to see a respectable journal publish this. The article didn't seem to mention even the real quantification or adequate comparison studies, no sign of replication either. Sad and it is a poor job for the BJM.
On the good news side, while dietitians in Canada don't recommend Atkins per se, the view about it IS changing. While it is true apparently that weight loss by low carb or low fat equal out eventually, no one has published anything about the reasons why the low fat plans just don't kick start some people. My body simply refuses to work on high-carb plans. I cannot lose at all. Some can but no one seems to study why that is.
Dietitians here seem to be more open to lower carb plans and choices. I am happy about that. I also see that the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation has an interactive food/weight tracking plan called Healthy weight action plan. The nice thing in it is that they allow people to choose between types of meal plans they recommend and one of the options is reduced carb. It isn't atkins but it is a lot better than the previous perceptions.
I am now using that one, the HWAP, but I have my atkins book in the kitchen and my goal is to get my intake healthy first and foremost and then keep it there as I transition toward Atkins again.
Aug 08, 2012 at 04:15 PM
HollyGreen
Hello, perhaps you can inform me. I have made a challenge to anyone that is informed about the Atkins products to give me sound-hard facts backing up their effectiveness with the program. I wrote up a forum post with my challenge, and when I saw you defending the Atkins brand I thought you would be just the person to do it. this is the Forum thread in question and I would really appreciate a moment of your time to set some things straight.
http://cauk.atkins.com/community/forums/board/thread.html?thread=487
tittle of post:
"Atkins Bars and Shakes> I need help!! A challenge to people who know?
I have blogged else where that should I not receive an in-depth response/ argument from someone who is in the know. that I and others shall stay away from the bars and shakes. I am hoping this in not the case. Please help.
http://cauk.atkins.com/community/forums/board/thread.html?thread=487
tittle of post:
"Atkins Bars and Shakes> I need help!! A challenge to people who know?
I have blogged else where that should I not receive an in-depth response/ argument from someone who is in the know. that I and others shall stay away from the bars and shakes. I am hoping this in not the case. Please help.
Aug 17, 2012 at 09:45 AM
Jacquelyn Miller
Hi hatedrain,
I have information from our nutritionist - Colette regarding the use of the Atkins products I will post below. I can also tell you from my own personal experience - the Atkins products help to make staying on plan even easier for me. I have used the products regularly and have not experienced any adverse effects, and in fact believe the convenience, nutrition and variety they help to provide is part of the reason for my success.
I believe it is also important to note that Colette worked directly with Dr Atkins and has a wealth of knowledge regarding his opinions and intentions with the Atkins program.
Here is the information from Colette:
"As a nutritionist one of the advantages of the Atkins Diet that I like the best is that it can be individualized to suit a person’s likes, dislikes, tastes and lifestyle. We are all heading in the same direction of permanent weight control and vibrant health but the paths we choose to get there may be very different.
While I agree that there are some individuals who may need a two week period of withdrawal from sweet tasting foods to break an addiction, there are also those individuals who would not succeed without a healthy substitute.
So my advice is usually as follows; if you can't stop at one bar or drink at a time, if products are sacrificing your intake of whole foods, then stay away from Atkins products for two weeks until you have things under control. Each individual has to determine for themselves what works or doesn't work.
Otherwise there is no reason why one should avoid Atkins products in Induction.
Out of the 60 plus studies supporting Atkins , there are 14 studies to date showing results of 6 month to 1 year follow up in which participants were allowed one to two serving of Atkins Bars or Shakes daily as part of the research protocol. The products did not interfere with weight loss and, in those studies that allowed Atkins products; there was better compliance and retention. In fact there was one researcher in another study from the Veteran's Administration who was opposed to using Atkins Products with her patient population and she had a tougher time with compliance and retention. At the end of the year, her study participants were consuming far higher levels of carbohydrates than the patient population who were allowed to use Atkins products, and the drop out rate was much higher."
I have information from our nutritionist - Colette regarding the use of the Atkins products I will post below. I can also tell you from my own personal experience - the Atkins products help to make staying on plan even easier for me. I have used the products regularly and have not experienced any adverse effects, and in fact believe the convenience, nutrition and variety they help to provide is part of the reason for my success.
I believe it is also important to note that Colette worked directly with Dr Atkins and has a wealth of knowledge regarding his opinions and intentions with the Atkins program.
Here is the information from Colette:
"As a nutritionist one of the advantages of the Atkins Diet that I like the best is that it can be individualized to suit a person’s likes, dislikes, tastes and lifestyle. We are all heading in the same direction of permanent weight control and vibrant health but the paths we choose to get there may be very different.
While I agree that there are some individuals who may need a two week period of withdrawal from sweet tasting foods to break an addiction, there are also those individuals who would not succeed without a healthy substitute.
So my advice is usually as follows; if you can't stop at one bar or drink at a time, if products are sacrificing your intake of whole foods, then stay away from Atkins products for two weeks until you have things under control. Each individual has to determine for themselves what works or doesn't work.
Otherwise there is no reason why one should avoid Atkins products in Induction.
Out of the 60 plus studies supporting Atkins , there are 14 studies to date showing results of 6 month to 1 year follow up in which participants were allowed one to two serving of Atkins Bars or Shakes daily as part of the research protocol. The products did not interfere with weight loss and, in those studies that allowed Atkins products; there was better compliance and retention. In fact there was one researcher in another study from the Veteran's Administration who was opposed to using Atkins Products with her patient population and she had a tougher time with compliance and retention. At the end of the year, her study participants were consuming far higher levels of carbohydrates than the patient population who were allowed to use Atkins products, and the drop out rate was much higher."
Aug 20, 2012 at 01:05 PM
jacquelyn miller
Hi Holly - I addressed my response to your user name in the forum.....full names show here on the Blog, user names in the forums. In case anyone was wondering why I would change your name. :)
Aug 20, 2012 at 01:06 PM
Autumn Hermakowski
Hi Colette, forum. I vehemently agree with your demand for a formal apology from BJM. There is no excuse for inaccurate comparisons in scientific literature (or anywhere else, for that matter).
I am about to imbark upon the NEW Atkins and am really looking forward to it for it's weight loss and health benefits; as well as for it's commitment to lifetime maintenance.
I think what a lot of people are just beginning to understand is the difference between different type of carbs, and there different effects on blood sugar, insulin, health and weight and is huge. You just can't compare a diet of good carbs with one based on any kind of processed carbs, especially if it includes sugar, which we're finding out more each day is a white poison to our bodies (although, I have to say, I've always had a sweet tooth.
The focus of the Atkin's diet on nutrient rich vegetables, 4-6 ozs (gender dependent) of protein at each meal and healthy ESSENTIAL fats, all portion appropriate, is an excellent way to eat to live. Colette, I'm grateful for your dedication to explaining and unfortunately, defending, a way of eating that can do a lot of good for a lot of people.
Thanks everyone for writing in your support and experiences -- your stories really make a difference! I love reading them :-)
Cheers and keep up the good work,
Autumn
I am about to imbark upon the NEW Atkins and am really looking forward to it for it's weight loss and health benefits; as well as for it's commitment to lifetime maintenance.
I think what a lot of people are just beginning to understand is the difference between different type of carbs, and there different effects on blood sugar, insulin, health and weight and is huge. You just can't compare a diet of good carbs with one based on any kind of processed carbs, especially if it includes sugar, which we're finding out more each day is a white poison to our bodies (although, I have to say, I've always had a sweet tooth.
The focus of the Atkin's diet on nutrient rich vegetables, 4-6 ozs (gender dependent) of protein at each meal and healthy ESSENTIAL fats, all portion appropriate, is an excellent way to eat to live. Colette, I'm grateful for your dedication to explaining and unfortunately, defending, a way of eating that can do a lot of good for a lot of people.
Thanks everyone for writing in your support and experiences -- your stories really make a difference! I love reading them :-)
Cheers and keep up the good work,
Autumn
Sep 08, 2012 at 12:18 AM
Morgan Hunter
This is an excerpt from the British medical Journal press release of Monday, June 25, 2012
“Studies on the long term consequences of these diets on cardiovascular health have generated inconsistent results. So a team of international authors carried out a study on just under 44,000 Swedish women aged between 30 and 49 years from 1991-92 (with an average follow-up of 15 years). Although the actual numbers are small (an extra 4-5 cases of cardiovascular disease per 10,000 women per year”
SO. . . Swedish woman spent a few minutes filling out a survey given by Author’s. 10 to 20 years later some of these same women again filled out a survey. So this was a snapshot a day in a life and then up to 20 years later. So how have you eaten over the last 20 years questioner?
Had this been a research project involving both men and woman, the participants first examined by medical doctors, followed with nutritional data being taken daily, compiled monthly and yearly with regular medical checks and blood work taken throughout the project. This result I would take notice of with a grain of salt.
I’m shocked this so called study by authors, was printed in the BMJ.
The results of which could have been interrupted either or any way “(4 to 5 cases in 10,000 women)”
“Studies on the long term consequences of these diets on cardiovascular health have generated inconsistent results. So a team of international authors carried out a study on just under 44,000 Swedish women aged between 30 and 49 years from 1991-92 (with an average follow-up of 15 years). Although the actual numbers are small (an extra 4-5 cases of cardiovascular disease per 10,000 women per year”
SO. . . Swedish woman spent a few minutes filling out a survey given by Author’s. 10 to 20 years later some of these same women again filled out a survey. So this was a snapshot a day in a life and then up to 20 years later. So how have you eaten over the last 20 years questioner?
Had this been a research project involving both men and woman, the participants first examined by medical doctors, followed with nutritional data being taken daily, compiled monthly and yearly with regular medical checks and blood work taken throughout the project. This result I would take notice of with a grain of salt.
I’m shocked this so called study by authors, was printed in the BMJ.
The results of which could have been interrupted either or any way “(4 to 5 cases in 10,000 women)”
Sep 25, 2012 at 06:52 PM
Comment
Latest Blog Posts